Add 1esdr (Ezra) responsory, composed from 1 Esdr 8:21-23

No liturgical precedent exists for this book; the verse's antithesis
("the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness: and
his power and strength, and wrath upon all them that forsake him") is
reordered so the hopeful clause repeats after the V., not the wrath
clause. Closes the per-book pool at 68/72 -- the last 4 have no
sourceable material at all.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ALE7phKTAnmRWvWMU9dZa7

TODO.md

@@ -6169,3 +6169,28 @@ Keyed `2esdr:` in the pool (not `neh:`) since that's what `BOOK_ALIASES` maps `n
 
 67 of 72 seeded. Remaining 5: Josue, Judices, 1-2 Chronicles (no citation anywhere at all) plus
 `ezra` (one thin, ambiguous near-miss, deliberately left unseeded — see the entry above).
+
+### Matins responsory pools: `1esdr` (Ezra) — composed, no liturgical precedent (2026-09-05)
+
+User-directed: compose Ezra's own responsory from 1 Esdras 8:21-23, on the verse's own merit — like
+`ruth`, not like `bar`/`2esdr`, since the one candidate lead for this book (`Pasc7-2.txt`'s Introit,
+see the earlier `ezra`/`neh` entry) turned out to be a text mismatch, not a real match to build from.
+
+v.22's antithesis ("the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness: and his power and
+strength, and wrath upon all them that forsake him") is the strongest material, but the Vulgate's own
+clause order puts the wrath half last — a sour note to end the repeated (`*`) clause on, especially
+right before v.23's "it fell out prosperously." Edited: swapped the two halves of v.22 so the hopeful
+clause is the one repeated after V. — same words, no invention, just reordered for the R./V./R. shape.
+V. is v.23 unaltered.
+
+Source (`1esdr-8.yml`) has no accents, like `ruth-1.yml`; Latin hand-accented, cross-checked
+word-by-word against already-accented occurrences elsewhere in the corpus (`impérium`, `fortitúdo`,
+`derelínquunt`, `bonitáte`, `jejunávimus`, `próspere`). Keyed `1esdr:` (`BOOK_ALIASES` maps `ezra` to
+it). `npm test` (2029 passed) and `tsc --noEmit` both pass; live-verified through
+`getBiblePlanReadings` (`easter-sunday`/Monday resolves real, correctly R./V.-formatted text in both
+languages for `Ezra 3-4`).
+
+68 of 72 seeded. This closes every book with any real sourceable material — the remaining 4 (Josue,
+Judices, 1-2 Chronicles) have no citation anywhere, Horas or Missa, and no scripture text of their
+own has been composed from on its own merit the way `ruth`/`ezra` were, since that hasn't been
+directed for them.

src/data/hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml

@@ -1295,3 +1295,28 @@ ruth:
     v:
       la: "Dixit autem Nehemías, et Esdras sacérdos et scriba, et levítæ interpretántes univérso pópulo: Dies sanctificátus est Dómino, Deo nostro, nolíte lugére et nolíte flere."
       en: "And Nehemias, and Esdras the priest and scribe, and the Levites who interpreted to all the people, said: This is a holy day to the Lord our God: do not mourn, nor weep."
+
+# `1esdr` (Ezra) — composed like `ruth`, not transcribed: 1 Esdras 8:21-23
+# has no liturgical precedent anywhere in the reference source (the one
+# candidate lead, `Pasc7-2.txt`'s Introit citing "Esdr 2:36-37", turned
+# out to be a text mismatch, likely a different, non-canonical "Esdras"
+# altogether — see the entry above; left unrelated to this one). User
+# picked v.22's antithesis ("the hand of our God is upon all them that
+# seek him in goodness: and his power and strength, and wrath upon all
+# them that forsake him") as the strongest content, but the Vulgate's
+# own clause order puts the wrath half last — a sour note to end the
+# repeated (`*`) clause on, especially right after v.23's "it fell out
+# prosperously." Edited: the two halves of v.22 are swapped so the
+# hopeful clause is the one repeated, same words, no invention. V. is
+# v.23 unaltered. Source has no accents (like `ruth-1.yml`); Latin
+# hand-accented, cross-checked word-by-word against already-accented
+# occurrences elsewhere in the corpus (impérium, fortitúdo, derelínquunt,
+# bonitáte, jejunávimus, próspere) rather than guessed freehand.
+# User-directed 2026-09-05.
+1esdr:
+  - r:
+      la: "Impérium ejus, et fortitúdo ejus, et furor ejus, super omnes qui derelínquunt eum: * Manus autem Dei nostri est super omnes qui quærunt eum in bonitáte."
+      en: "His power, and his strength, and his wrath, is upon all them that forsake him: * But the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness."
+    v:
+      la: "Jejunávimus autem, et rogávimus Deum nostrum pro hoc: et evénit nobis próspere."
+      en: "And we fasted, and besought our God for this: and it fell out prosperously unto us."