From dcea19015f3ae63dddee9e3ee5fa6dc15554f4d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Estes Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 06:39:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add 1esdr (Ezra) responsory, composed from 1 Esdr 8:21-23 No liturgical precedent exists for this book; the verse's antithesis ("the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness: and his power and strength, and wrath upon all them that forsake him") is reordered so the hopeful clause repeats after the V., not the wrath clause. Closes the per-book pool at 68/72 -- the last 4 have no sourceable material at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ALE7phKTAnmRWvWMU9dZa7 --- TODO.md | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ .../hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/TODO.md b/TODO.md index 47ff010..5cd4152 100644 --- a/TODO.md +++ b/TODO.md @@ -6169,3 +6169,28 @@ Keyed `2esdr:` in the pool (not `neh:`) since that's what `BOOK_ALIASES` maps `n 67 of 72 seeded. Remaining 5: Josue, Judices, 1-2 Chronicles (no citation anywhere at all) plus `ezra` (one thin, ambiguous near-miss, deliberately left unseeded — see the entry above). + +### Matins responsory pools: `1esdr` (Ezra) — composed, no liturgical precedent (2026-09-05) + +User-directed: compose Ezra's own responsory from 1 Esdras 8:21-23, on the verse's own merit — like +`ruth`, not like `bar`/`2esdr`, since the one candidate lead for this book (`Pasc7-2.txt`'s Introit, +see the earlier `ezra`/`neh` entry) turned out to be a text mismatch, not a real match to build from. + +v.22's antithesis ("the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness: and his power and +strength, and wrath upon all them that forsake him") is the strongest material, but the Vulgate's own +clause order puts the wrath half last — a sour note to end the repeated (`*`) clause on, especially +right before v.23's "it fell out prosperously." Edited: swapped the two halves of v.22 so the hopeful +clause is the one repeated after V. — same words, no invention, just reordered for the R./V./R. shape. +V. is v.23 unaltered. + +Source (`1esdr-8.yml`) has no accents, like `ruth-1.yml`; Latin hand-accented, cross-checked +word-by-word against already-accented occurrences elsewhere in the corpus (`impérium`, `fortitúdo`, +`derelínquunt`, `bonitáte`, `jejunávimus`, `próspere`). Keyed `1esdr:` (`BOOK_ALIASES` maps `ezra` to +it). `npm test` (2029 passed) and `tsc --noEmit` both pass; live-verified through +`getBiblePlanReadings` (`easter-sunday`/Monday resolves real, correctly R./V.-formatted text in both +languages for `Ezra 3-4`). + +68 of 72 seeded. This closes every book with any real sourceable material — the remaining 4 (Josue, +Judices, 1-2 Chronicles) have no citation anywhere, Horas or Missa, and no scripture text of their +own has been composed from on its own merit the way `ruth`/`ezra` were, since that hasn't been +directed for them. diff --git a/src/data/hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml b/src/data/hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml index 1142024..fb7f653 100644 --- a/src/data/hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml +++ b/src/data/hours/matins-responsories-by-book.yml @@ -1295,3 +1295,28 @@ ruth: v: la: "Dixit autem Nehemías, et Esdras sacérdos et scriba, et levítæ interpretántes univérso pópulo: Dies sanctificátus est Dómino, Deo nostro, nolíte lugére et nolíte flere." en: "And Nehemias, and Esdras the priest and scribe, and the Levites who interpreted to all the people, said: This is a holy day to the Lord our God: do not mourn, nor weep." + +# `1esdr` (Ezra) — composed like `ruth`, not transcribed: 1 Esdras 8:21-23 +# has no liturgical precedent anywhere in the reference source (the one +# candidate lead, `Pasc7-2.txt`'s Introit citing "Esdr 2:36-37", turned +# out to be a text mismatch, likely a different, non-canonical "Esdras" +# altogether — see the entry above; left unrelated to this one). User +# picked v.22's antithesis ("the hand of our God is upon all them that +# seek him in goodness: and his power and strength, and wrath upon all +# them that forsake him") as the strongest content, but the Vulgate's +# own clause order puts the wrath half last — a sour note to end the +# repeated (`*`) clause on, especially right after v.23's "it fell out +# prosperously." Edited: the two halves of v.22 are swapped so the +# hopeful clause is the one repeated, same words, no invention. V. is +# v.23 unaltered. Source has no accents (like `ruth-1.yml`); Latin +# hand-accented, cross-checked word-by-word against already-accented +# occurrences elsewhere in the corpus (impérium, fortitúdo, derelínquunt, +# bonitáte, jejunávimus, próspere) rather than guessed freehand. +# User-directed 2026-09-05. +1esdr: + - r: + la: "Impérium ejus, et fortitúdo ejus, et furor ejus, super omnes qui derelínquunt eum: * Manus autem Dei nostri est super omnes qui quærunt eum in bonitáte." + en: "His power, and his strength, and his wrath, is upon all them that forsake him: * But the hand of our God is upon all them that seek him in goodness." + v: + la: "Jejunávimus autem, et rogávimus Deum nostrum pro hoc: et evénit nobis próspere." + en: "And we fasted, and besought our God for this: and it fell out prosperously unto us."