Files
vu/src/data/propers/nocturn-readings/month-week-095.yml
T
will 0fb3b4c13e
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m26s
Prepend R. to nocturn-readings responsories missing their opening marker
All 53 nocturn-readings files with a responsory field started straight
into the text with no leading R., unlike octave-readings' own R./V.
convention. Fixed in content per direct instruction (not injected at
render time), matching each file's own existing plain V./R. style rather
than switching to octave-readings' R./V. glyphs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EWzE3kaSZCs79fPBrrE1aF
2026-08-23 08:51:16 -04:00

64 lines
4.8 KiB
YAML

# Matins Nocturn 2 for "5th Sunday of September" (Tempora/095-0.txt) — see
# month-week-081.yml's header for the id scheme. Own Responsory4 (not a
# cross-reference).
id: month-week-095
readings:
- nocturn: 2
isGospel: false
source: "St. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, De Officiis, Book 3, ch. 15-16"
text:
la: >-
Quid Esther regína, nonne ut pópulum suum perículo erúeret (quod erat decórum atque honéstum)
morti se óbtulit, nec immítis regis trepidávit furórem? Ipse quoque rex Persárum, ferox atque
túmido corde, tamen decórum judicávit índici insidiárum, quæ sibi parátæ forent, grátiam
repræsentáre, populúmque líberum a servitúte erípere, erúere neci, nec párcere neci ejus, qui
tam indecóra suasísset. Dénique quem secúndum a se, ac præcípuum inter omnes amícos habéret,
cruci trádidit, quod dehonestátum se ejus frauduléntis consíliis animadvertísset.
Ea enim amicítia probábilis, quæ honestátem tuétur, præferénda sane ópibus, honóribus,
potestátibus; honestáti vero præférri non solet, sed honestátem sequi. Qualis fuit Jónathæ, qui
pro pietáte nec offénsam patris, nec salútis perículum refugiébat. Qualis fuit Achímelech, qui
pro hospitális grátiæ offíciis necem pótius sibi, quam proditiónem fugiéntis amíci, subeúndam
arbitrabátur. Nihil ígitur præferéndum honestáti; quæ tamen ne amicítiæ stúdio prætereátur,
étiam hoc Scriptúra ádmonet.
Sunt enim plerǽque philosophórum quæstiónes: Utrum amíci causa quisquam contra pátriam
sentíre necne débeat, ut amíco obédiat: utrum opórteat ut fidem déserat, dum indúlget atque
inténdit amíci commoditátibus. Et Scriptúra quidem ait: Clava, et gládius, et sagítta ferráta,
sic homo est testimónium dans falsum advérsus amícum suum. Sed consídera quid ástruat. Non
testimónium reprehéndit dictum in amícum, sed falsum testimónium. Quid enim si Dei causa, quid
si pátriæ, cogátur áliquis dícere testimónium? Numquid præponderáre debet amicítia religióni,
præponderáre caritáti vítium?
en: >-
What did Queen Esther? Did she not, to save her people from danger (a beautiful and noble
object) put herself in jeopardy of death, and face the anger of the cruel King? The King of the
Persians, cruel and violent as he was, nevertheless thought it seemly to show grace unto him
that told him of the plot that was made against him, to free the people from bondage, and to
deliver them from death, but not to spare him that had persuaded such iniquity. In the end he
sent to the gallows him whom he had held second only to himself, and chiefest among all his
friends, because he found himself dishonoured through his false counsels.
That true friendship, which careth for honour, careth less for riches, or dignities, or power
than for itself, but for honour before itself. Such was the friendship of Jonathan, which
caused him to risk the anger of his father, and danger to himself. Such was the friendship of
Achimelech, who chose to earn death for himself by giving relief to David, rather than to
betray the outlaw. But before honour nothing is to be put, and friendship must not be allowed
to outrun it, even as we are warned by the Scriptures.
The Philosophers have started diverse questions: whether friendship can, or cannot, justify
disloyalty to a man's own country; whether friendship can, or cannot, justify serving a friend
at the cost of breach of faith. Scripture indeed saith, "A man that beareth false witness
against his neighbour, is a maul, and a sword, and a sharp arrow." (Prov. 25:18.) But mark that
what is here condemned is not witness by itself, but false witness. How if a man be compelled
to give such witness, for the sake of God or for the sake of his country? Ought friendship to
outweigh religion? Is not to say this, as much as to say that a sinful weakness is to outweigh
a duty?
responsory:
la: "R. Meménto mei, Dómine Deus, in bonum: * Et ne déleas miseratiónes meas, quas feci in domo Dei mei et in cæremóniis ejus.\nV. Recordáre mei, Dómine, Deus meus.\nR. Et ne déleas miseratiónes meas, quas feci in domo Dei mei et in cæremóniis ejus."
en: "R. Remember me for good, O Lord God, * And put not away my works of mercy, which I have wrought in the house of my God, and in the times of His solemn rites.\nV. Remember me, O Lord my God.\nR. And put not away my works of mercy, which I have wrought in the house of my God, and in the times of His solemn rites."
status: { la: verified, en: verified }