Commit Graph

153 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
will cc0d8cc892 calendar: move St. Hilary of Poitiers to his real date, Jan 14
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 53s
Confirmed against the raw [Officium] file directly: Jan 14 is Hilary
(Latin/Sancti/01-14.txt), Jan 23 is St. Raymond of Peñafort
(Latin/Sancti/01-23.txt) -- not Hilary at all. The original Jan-23
placement wasn't fabricated, just misled by its own source: 2029 is a
real year where Jan 14 falls on a Sunday and every day through the
22nd is already occupied by another feast, so Hilary genuinely
transfers all the way to the 23rd that one year -- the app had
mistaken that transfer-year artifact for his real, fixed date.

His collect text is unaffected (a feast's collect doesn't change based
on which day it's said), re-confirmed identical on his real date.
Benedictus antiphon pulled fresh, completing January's antiphon pass
(9/9).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 20:57:43 -04:00
will 0878c3d60c propers: Benedictus antiphons for January's sanctoral entries (9/9)
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 50s
All 9 January saints with a propers id: 5 authored fresh (Marcellus I,
Paul the Hermit, Fabian & Sebastian, Vincent & Anastasius, John
Chrysostom), 3 corrected (Chair of St. Peter at Rome, Agnes,
Conversion of St. Paul -- each confirmed sourced from the Roman rite's
raw [Ant 1] rather than a real Monastic 1617 rendering, same mistake
as St. Lawrence's earlier fix), 1 left honestly missing (Hilary of
Poitiers -- this app's calendar has him Jan 23, but Divinum Officium's
own calendar has him Jan 14; flagged in TODO.md rather than guessed
at). See TODO.md for the full remaining scope and the method this
settled on after automated matching proved unreliable on real edge
cases (shared dates, saints the reference engine doesn't carry at
all).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 16:58:18 -04:00
will cea23a4dc5 docs: add a real backlog (TODO.md)
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 48s
Was scattered across code comments and session summaries with no
single place to check what's actually left open -- consolidated here,
with concrete lists (which duplex-majus+ saints still need a Lauds
psalmody override, which already-authored Benedictus antiphons are
unverified against Monastic 1617 vs. the Roman rite they may have
actually been sourced from) rather than vague pointers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 15:30:14 -04:00