Add the Patronage of St. Joseph as a new movable feast with octave
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m21s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m21s
This Duplex I classis feast (instituted by Pius IX, 1847) didn't exist anywhere in vu's calendar. Dated per the older, pre-1955 reckoning -- Wednesday after the 2nd Sunday after Easter (Easter+17) -- rather than the 1913 Pius X reform's later placement on the 3rd Sunday after Easter itself, per direct instruction. Mechanism: one new temporal-feast record plus a new EASTER_OFFSET_STARTS table entry (the only code change -- everything else is the existing generic anchor-driven resolution). Authored the feast day's own Matins reading and its full 7-day octave (days 2/3/4/6/7/8; day 5, the Sunday, has no override in the source at all, correctly left unauthored). Fixed one real collateral effect: an existing fixed-year calendar test (St. Pudentiana vs. St. Peter Celestine, 2038-05-19) broke because that date now falls on this octave's own closing day, tying Celestine's rank against the octave's threshold -- the app's own documented tie-break correctly favors the octave that year. Moved the proof date to 2033. Also bumped the PWA precache file-size cap (6 MiB -> 8 MiB) since this content pull pushed the main bundle past the previous limit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PhysogLP9eCeKS7JEwRi6y
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
||||
# Matins Nocturn 2-3 for the Patronage of St. Joseph (Wednesday after the
|
||||
# 2nd Sunday after Easter, Easter+17 -- see
|
||||
# data/calendar/temporal-feasts/patronage-of-st-joseph.yml for the dating
|
||||
# note). Sourced from web/www/horas/Latin+English/Tempora/Pasc2-3.txt.
|
||||
# Nocturn 1 (Lectio1-3, Genesis 39/41 -- the patriarch Joseph as a type)
|
||||
# left to the bible-plan store, same convention as every other nocturn-
|
||||
# readings file. Nocturn 2 (Lectio4-6): one continuous sermon of
|
||||
# St. Bernardine of Siena on St. Joseph. Nocturn 3 (Lectio7-9): Lectio7's
|
||||
# own Gospel pericope (Luke 3:21-23) is a bare "Et réliqua" incipit,
|
||||
# dropped per the usual rule; St. Augustine's homily on the two
|
||||
# genealogies (Matthew's and Luke's) follows, isGospel: false.
|
||||
id: patronage-of-st-joseph
|
||||
readings:
|
||||
- nocturn: 2
|
||||
isGospel: false
|
||||
text:
|
||||
la: >-
|
||||
Ómnium singulárium gratiárum alícui rationábili creatúræ communicatárum generális régula
|
||||
est, quod, quandocúmque divína grátia éligit áliquem ad áliquam grátiam sublímem statum,
|
||||
ómnia charísmata donet, quæ illi persónæ sic eléctæ et ejus offício necessária sunt atque
|
||||
illam copióse décorant. Quod máxime verificátum est in sancto Joseph, putatívo patre
|
||||
Dómini nostri Jesu Christi, et vero sponso Regínæ mundi et Dóminæ Angelórum; qui ab
|
||||
ætérno Patre eléctus est fidélis nutrítius atque custos principálium thesaurórum suórum,
|
||||
scílicet Fílii ejus et Sponsæ suæ: quod offícium fidelíssime prosecútus est. Cui proptérea
|
||||
Dóminus ait: Serve bone et fidélis, intra in gáudium Dómini tui.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Si cómpares eum ad totam Ecclésiam Christi, nonne iste est homo eléctus et speciális, per
|
||||
quem et sub quo Christus est ordináte et honéste introdúctus in mundum? Si ergo Vírgini
|
||||
Matri tota Ecclésia sancta débitrix est, quia per eam Christum suscípere digna facta est:
|
||||
sic profécto post eam huic debet grátiam et reveréntiam singulárem. Ipse enim est clavis
|
||||
véteris testaménti, in qua patriarchális et prophetális dígnitas promíssum conséquitur
|
||||
fructum. Porro hic est solus, qui corporáliter possédit, quod eis divína dignátio
|
||||
repromísit. Mérito ígitur figurátur per illum patriárcham Joseph, qui pópulis fruménta
|
||||
servávit. Sed et hic illum præcéllit, quia non solum Ægýptiis panem corporális vitæ, sed
|
||||
ómnibus eléctis panem de cælo, qui cæléstem vitam tríbuit, cum multa sollértia enutrívit.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Profécto dubitándum non est, quod Christus familiaritátem, reveréntiam atque sublimíssimam
|
||||
dignitátem, quam illi exhíbuit, dum ágeret in humánis, tamquam fílius patri suo, in cælis
|
||||
útique non negávit, quin pótius complévit et consummávit. Unde non immérito in verbo
|
||||
propósito a Dómino subinfértur: Intra in gáudium Dómini tui. Unde, licet gáudium ætérnæ
|
||||
beatitúdinis in cor hóminis intret, máluit tamen Dóminus ei dícere, Intra in gáudium; ut
|
||||
mýstice innuátur, quod gáudium illud non solum in eo sit intra, sed úndique illum
|
||||
circúmdans et absórbens, et ipsum velut abýssus infiníta submérgens. Meménto ígitur
|
||||
nostri, beáte Joseph, et tuæ oratiónis suffrágio apud tuum putatívum Fílium intercéde; sed
|
||||
et beatíssimam Vírginem sponsam tuam nobis propítiam redde, quæ Mater est ejus, qui cum
|
||||
Patre et Spíritu Sancto vivit et regnat per infiníta sǽcula sæculórum. Amen.
|
||||
en: >-
|
||||
The general rule governing all the singular graces communicated to any rational creature
|
||||
is this: whenever divine grace chooseth someone for some sublime state of grace, it
|
||||
bestoweth upon him every gift that is necessary for that person so chosen and for his
|
||||
office, and that adorneth him abundantly. This was most of all verified in St. Joseph,
|
||||
the supposed father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and true spouse of the Queen of the world
|
||||
and Lady of the Angels — who was chosen by the eternal Father to be the faithful nurse
|
||||
and guardian of His principal treasures, namely His Son and His Spouse, an office which
|
||||
he fulfilled most faithfully. For this the Lord saith unto him: Well done, good and
|
||||
faithful servant, enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
If thou compare him to the whole Church of Christ, is he not that chosen and singular man
|
||||
through whom, and under whom, Christ was orderly and honourably brought into the world?
|
||||
If, then, the whole holy Church is debtor to the Virgin Mother, because through her she
|
||||
was made worthy to receive Christ, so, next after her, doth she owe to Joseph a singular
|
||||
grace and reverence. For he is the key of the Old Testament, in which the dignity of the
|
||||
patriarchs and prophets attaineth the fruit that was promised them. Moreover, he alone is
|
||||
he who bodily possessed what divine condescension had promised them. Rightly, then, is he
|
||||
prefigured by that patriarch Joseph, who kept in store the grain for the peoples. But he
|
||||
surpasseth him even in this: for he nourished with much diligence, not only bread for the
|
||||
bodily life of the Egyptians, but for all the elect the Bread from heaven, which
|
||||
bestoweth heavenly life.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Assuredly we ought not to doubt that Christ, in heaven, did not deny — but rather fulfilled
|
||||
and consummated — the familiarity, reverence, and most sublime dignity which He showed
|
||||
him while He lived among men, as a son toward his father. Whence not without cause is it
|
||||
added, in the word proposed by the Lord: Enter thou into the joy of thy lord. And though
|
||||
the joy of eternal blessedness entereth into the heart of man, the Lord chose rather to
|
||||
say to him, Enter into the joy, that it might be mystically understood that this joy is
|
||||
not only within him, but on every side surrounding and absorbing him, and, as it were, an
|
||||
infinite abyss engulfing him. Remember us, then, blessed Joseph, and by the pleading of
|
||||
thy prayer intercede with thy supposed Son; and render to us gracious the most blessed
|
||||
Virgin, thy spouse, who is the Mother of Him Who liveth and reigneth with the Father and
|
||||
the Holy Ghost, world without end. Amen.
|
||||
status: { la: verified, en: verified }
|
||||
- nocturn: 3
|
||||
isGospel: false
|
||||
text:
|
||||
la: >-
|
||||
Maniféstum est illud quod ait, Ut putabátur fílius Joseph, propter illos dixísse, qui eum
|
||||
ex Joseph, sicut álii hómines nascúntur, natum arbitrántur. Quos autem movet, quod álios
|
||||
progenitóres Matthǽus enúmerat, descéndens a David usque ad Joseph, álios autem Lucas,
|
||||
ascéndens a Joseph usque ad David; fácile est, ut advértant duos patres habére potuísse
|
||||
Joseph: unum, a quo génitus, álterum, a quo fúerit adoptátus. Antíqua est enim
|
||||
consuetúdo adoptándi étiam in illo pópulo Dei, ut sibi fílios fácerent, quos non ipsi
|
||||
genuíssent. Unde intellígitur Lucas patrem Joseph, non a quo génitus, sed a quo fúerat
|
||||
adoptátus, suscepísse in Evangélio suo, cujus progenitóres sursum versus commémorat,
|
||||
donec exíret ad David.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Cum enim necésse sit, utróque Evangelísta vera narránte, et Matthǽo scílicet et Luca, ut
|
||||
unus eórum ejus patris oríginem tenéret qui genúerat, alter ejus qui adoptáverat Joseph;
|
||||
quem probabílius intellígimus adoptántis oríginem tenuísse quam eum, qui nóluit Joseph
|
||||
génitum dícere ab illo cujus eum fílium esse narrábat? Matthǽus autem dicens, Ábraham
|
||||
génuit Isaac, Isaac génuit Jacob, atque ita in hoc verbo, quod est, Génuit, persevérans,
|
||||
donec in último díceret, Jacob autem génuit Joseph; satis expréssit ad eum patrem se
|
||||
perduxísse oríginem generátium, a quo Joseph non adoptátus, sed génitus erat.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Quamquam si étiam Lucas génitum díceret Joseph ab Heli, nec sic nos hoc verbum
|
||||
perturbáre debéret, ut áliud crederémus quam ab uno Evangelísta gignéntem, ab áltero
|
||||
adoptántem patrem fuísse commemorátum. Neque enim absúrde quisque dícitur non carne sed
|
||||
caritáte genuísse, quem fílium sibi adoptáverit. At vero étiam nos, quibus dedit Deus
|
||||
potestátem fílios ejus fíeri, de natúra atque substántia sua non nos génuit, sicut
|
||||
únicum Fílium, sed útique dilectióne adoptávit.
|
||||
en: >-
|
||||
It is plain that the words, "As was supposed, the son of Joseph," were said on account of
|
||||
those who thought him born of Joseph as other men are born of their fathers. But as for
|
||||
those who are troubled that Matthew names one set of ancestors, descending from David
|
||||
down to Joseph, while Luke names another, ascending from Joseph up to David, it is easy
|
||||
for them to see that Joseph could have had two fathers: one by whom he was begotten,
|
||||
another by whom he was adopted. For it was an ancient custom, even among that people of
|
||||
God, to adopt as sons those whom one had not begotten. Whence it is understood that Luke
|
||||
took up in his Gospel the father of Joseph by whom he was adopted, not by whom he was
|
||||
begotten, and traces his ancestors upward until he reaches David.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
For since it must needs be, both Evangelists narrating truly — that is, Matthew and Luke —
|
||||
that one of them should hold to the origin of the father who begot him, and the other to
|
||||
the origin of the father who adopted Joseph, which is it more probable that we should
|
||||
understand held to the origin of the adopter, rather than of him who refused to say
|
||||
Joseph was begotten by him whose son he nonetheless narrates him to be? Matthew, however,
|
||||
saying, "Abraham begot Isaac, Isaac begot Jacob," and so persevering in this word,
|
||||
"begot," until at the last he saith, "And Jacob begot Joseph," hath sufficiently shown
|
||||
that he traced the line down to the father by whom Joseph was not adopted, but begotten.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Yet even if Luke had said that Joseph was begotten by Heli, this word ought not to trouble
|
||||
us so as to make us believe otherwise than that one Evangelist commemorated the begetting
|
||||
father, the other the adopting father. For it is not absurd to say that a man hath
|
||||
begotten, not by flesh but by love, one whom he hath adopted as his son. Indeed even we,
|
||||
to whom God hath given power to become His sons, He begot not of His own nature and
|
||||
substance, as He did His Only Son, but rather adopted us through love.
|
||||
status: { la: verified, en: verified }
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user