Author missing Matins Gospel pericopes across nocturn-readings store
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m56s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m56s
~110 of 355 nocturn-readings files had a patristic homily with no paired Gospel-pericope text -- the homily discussing a Gospel that was never itself transcribed into the file. Closed in two waves (the first pass's source-string regex missed many real cases where the citation lived only in a header comment or wasn't named at all), each entry sourced from divinum-officium-reference's own Missale files (following Sancti/Commune redirects where a feast reuses another's Gospel) and verified per file rather than assumed -- several candidates turned out to be genuine Nocturn 2 content or Common-of-saints cross-references with no proper Gospel of their own, correctly left untouched. Includes both live-reported gaps: St. Joseph of Cupertino's own Bk. II Homily 38 (Matt 22:1-14) and the Vigil of St. Matthew's Ambrose homily (Luke 5:27-32). TODO.md logs the closed item plus a new, distinct follow-up: a handful of files with no Nocturn 3 content authored at all (not just an unpaired Gospel), found along the way. npm test (2029 passed) and tsc --noEmit both pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MKC2QQGLYo2UTiDjDyWEkW
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,10 +4,21 @@
|
||||
# Nocturn 2: Lectio4-5 (two excerpts from Pope St. Leo the Great's own
|
||||
# Nativity sermons) plus Lectio6 (Pius XI's own history of this feast's
|
||||
# institution, 1931, for the 1500th anniversary of the Council of
|
||||
# Ephesus), combined into one reading. Nocturn 3: the Gospel citation
|
||||
# ends "Et réliqua"/"And so on" with no full pericope given -- per the
|
||||
# bare-incipit convention, only the homily (Lectio7-9, St. Bernard of
|
||||
# Clairvaux) is authored, isGospel: false, no citation field.
|
||||
# Ephesus), combined into one reading, not Gospel-tied. Nocturn 3:
|
||||
# Lectio7-9, St. Bernard of Clairvaux's Homily 1 in Praise of the
|
||||
# Virgin Mother (on Luke 2:43-51, the Finding in the Temple -- "Fili,
|
||||
# quid fecísti nobis sic?" is this homily's own opening line, quoting
|
||||
# that pericope directly, not the "Missus est"/Annunciation Bernard
|
||||
# series reused elsewhere in this store).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Update (2026-09-05): the Gospel pericope itself (Luke 2:43-51) is now
|
||||
# authored too (isGospel: true, immediately before the homily) --
|
||||
# sourced from missa/Latin/Sancti/10-11.txt's own [Evangelium] (this
|
||||
# same feast's own Mass Gospel) and its English parallel, not guessed
|
||||
# at, and not the Annunciation pericope (Luke 1:26-38) initially
|
||||
# suspected -- this feast's own Nocturn 3 Gospel is genuinely the
|
||||
# Finding in the Temple, confirmed via horas/Latin/Sancti/10-11.txt's
|
||||
# own Lectio7.
|
||||
id: maternity-of-the-bvm
|
||||
readings:
|
||||
- nocturn: 2
|
||||
@@ -133,6 +144,36 @@ readings:
|
||||
of a double of the second class.
|
||||
status: { la: verified, en: verified }
|
||||
|
||||
- nocturn: 3
|
||||
isGospel: true
|
||||
citation: { la: "Luc 2:43-51", en: "Luke 2:43-51" }
|
||||
text:
|
||||
la: >-
|
||||
In illo témpore: Cum redírent, remánsit puer Jesus in Jerúsalem, et non cognovérunt
|
||||
paréntes ejus. Existimántes autem illum esse in comitátu, venérunt iter diei, et
|
||||
requirébant eum inter cognátos, et notos. Et non inveniéntes, regréssi sunt in Jerúsalem,
|
||||
requiréntes eum. Et factum est, post tríduum invenérunt illum in templo sedéntem in médio
|
||||
doctórum, audiéntem illos, et interrogántem eos. Stupébant autem omnes, qui eum
|
||||
audiébant, super prudéntia et respónsis ejus. Et vidéntes admiráti sunt. Et dixit mater
|
||||
ejus ad illum: Fili, quid fecísti nobis sic? ecce pater tuus, et ego doléntes
|
||||
quærebámus te. Et ait ad illos: Quid est quod me quærebátis? nesciebátis quia in his,
|
||||
quæ Patris mei sunt, opórtet me esse? Et ipsi non intellexérunt verbum, quod locútus est
|
||||
ad eos. Et descéndit cum eis, et venit Názareth: et erat súbditus illis.
|
||||
en: >-
|
||||
At that time, when they were returning, the Boy Jesus remained in Jerusalem, and His
|
||||
parents did not know it. But thinking that He was in the caravan, they had come a day's
|
||||
journey before it occurred to them to look for Him among their relatives and
|
||||
acquaintances. And not finding Him, they returned to Jerusalem in search of Him. And it
|
||||
came to pass after three days, that they found Him in the temple, sitting in the midst of
|
||||
the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. And all who were listening to
|
||||
Him were amazed at His understanding and His answers. And when they saw Him, they were
|
||||
astonished. And His Mother said to Him, Son, why have You done so to us? Behold, in
|
||||
sorrow Your father and I have been seeking You. And He said to them, How is it that you
|
||||
sought Me? Did you not know that I must be about My Father's business? And they did not
|
||||
understand the word that He spoke to them. And He went down with them and came to
|
||||
Nazareth, and was subject to them.
|
||||
status: { la: verified, en: verified }
|
||||
|
||||
- nocturn: 3
|
||||
isGospel: false
|
||||
source: "St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Homily 1 in Praise of the Virgin Mother"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user