will/vu
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Note user's explanation for the Ezra Introit citation mismatch
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m53s
Details

Browse Source 
Vulgate "Esdras" numbering is genuinely ambiguous: 1/2 Esdras is
canonical Ezra/Nehemiah, but there's also a separate non-canonical
Greek "Esdras A" (the Vulgate appendix's own 3 Esdras, sometimes
itself called "1 Esdras" in Septuagint/Orthodox numbering) -- a
different text this project has never digitized. The reference
engine's own citation never disambiguates, so this can't be
confirmed, but it cleanly explains why the Pasc7-2.txt Introit's
"Esdr 2:36-37" citation doesn't match our canonical Ezra text.
Practical outcome unchanged (ezra stays unseeded), now documented
with a clear reason rather than an open mystery.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AGjUyhUZJaSjiniEmnLdak
This commit is contained in:
Will Estes
2026-09-04 21:51:06 -04:00
parent e52c285f99
commit 3ee87098c0
1 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
TODO.md
+10 -4
View File
@@ -6113,10 +6113,16 @@ too (Josue, Judices, Ruth, 1-2 Chronicles) — genuinely zero citations anywhere
Ezra came up with one thin, ambiguous lead not acted on: `missa/Latin/Tempora/Pasc7-2.txt`'s Ezra came up with one thin, ambiguous lead not acted on: `missa/Latin/Tempora/Pasc7-2.txt`'s
Introit cites `!Esdr 2:36 2:37`, but the actual Vulgate text there (checked against Introit cites `!Esdr 2:36 2:37`, but the actual Vulgate text there (checked against
`data/scripture/1esdr-2.yml`) is a plain census list that doesn't match the Introit's own text at `data/scripture/1esdr-2.yml`) is a plain census list that doesn't match the Introit's own text at
all ("Accípite jucunditátem glóriæ vestræ... qui vos ad cœléstia regna vocávit") — that phrasing all ("Accípite jucunditátem glóriæ vestræ... qui vos ad cœléstia regna vocávit"). User's own
loosely echoes Nehemiah 8:10 instead, but isn't a verbatim match either, and it's only two lines to explanation (2026-09-05), plausible and probably right, though unprovable without a text we don't
begin with, nowhere near as solid as Baruch's own full Vigil prophecy. Left both `ezra` and `neh` have: Vulgate numbering is genuinely ambiguous here — "1/2 Esdras" is canonical Ezra/Nehemiah, but
unseeded rather than force an uncertain match. One small, unrelated loose end noted along the way there's also a separate, non-canonical Greek "Esdras A" (the Vulgate appendix's own "3 Esdras,"
sometimes itself called "1 Esdras" in Septuagint/Orthodox numbering) — a different text entirely
that this project has never digitized. The reference engine's own citation never disambiguates
("Esdr" bare, no "3" anywhere else in the source to compare against), so this can't be confirmed
outright, but it cleanly explains why the citation doesn't match our canonical Ezra text. Left
both `ezra` and `neh` unseeded rather than force an uncertain match. One small, unrelated loose end
noted along the way
and not addressed here: the bible-plan TSV's own content still isn't covered by a table-driven and not addressed here: the bible-plan TSV's own content still isn't covered by a table-driven
test the way other bulk-imported content stores are (see "Bible-plan TSV — bulk conversion done" test the way other bulk-imported content stores are (see "Bible-plan TSV — bulk conversion done"
below) — `tests/propers/bible-plan.test.ts` tests specific real dates ad hoc, not the full imported below) — `tests/propers/bible-plan.test.ts` tests specific real dates ad hoc, not the full imported